Two days ago, a group called the EDL came to leicester and staged a violent demonstration regarded by most external observers as anti-Muslim. Yesterday the people of Leicester responded with a celebration of unity in diversity. It may not surprise you to learn that the two events were not reported in the same way.
The following is the text of a letter of complaint I am sending to the BBC:
A news organization has a responsibility to report political issues in an even-handed way. Thus a statement from a spokesperson of one party is typically followed by an answering statement from the others.
So where was the balance last weekend in the BBC’s reporting of events in Leicester? The EDL had arranged a demonstration for Saturday, viewed by many as anti-Muslim. The City Council urged those people in Leicester who wished to present an opposing view to avoid direct confrontation, but instead to come into the city on the following day and demonstrate the fact that we as a city embrace and celebrate our religious and ethnic diversity.
The BBC, along with other news organizations, turned up and covered the EDL demonstrations. But what national news coverage did the city’s response to the EDL receive? I searched in vain for any coverage of Sunday’s huge celebration – which frankly dwarfed the EDL’s event.
How can the BBC justify such bias in its coverage of a political issue? The coverage is not just misrepresentative, it is also in itself damaging. At the very least, equal time should have been given to the city’s response.
If your answer is that the events on Sunday were not reported because there was no street violence, then you are telling the world that violence is an effective means of getting a message heard. Should that be the message of the BBC?
I'm adding this note following a call from someone who works for BBC Radio Leicester: The local radio did cover the One Leicester celebration. What is more, the local paper, the Mercury, has had excellent coverage. My point here is the stark imbalance in like-for-like coverage at the national level. I listened to equivalent news broadcasts on Saturday and Sunday evening and found the EDL demo had been covered but not One Leicester.
Monday, October 11, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Well said, Rod. I saw a little of the demo on East Midlands today at 5.30 on Saturday evening. For once the Leicester Mercury stopped reporting about football and actually gave serious coverage to the EDL March and Peace Protest in yesterday's paper. The BBC were, frankly, pathetic. Perhaps, if this march had taken place in Bradford or Burnley it might have got more coverage. I was left to look at footage posted on FBook to get some idea of the scale of the thing. There was quite a bit of reporting on yesterday's East Midlands News about the peace protest - but if your tv aerial points the wrong way in Leicester you only get coverage of Nottingham based stories. The point being that Leicester and its stand against fascism is only worthy of a footnote in the BBC's eyes. Would be interested to see if you get a reply from them and what they say. More Power to your elbow.
Thanks for the comment Lizzie.
I do feel very proud of the way this city responded to Saturday's violence and negativity.
Post a Comment